The decentralized AI sector is facing turmoil as Bittensor's TAO token plunged over 20% following Covenant AI's announcement to exit the network. This withdrawal raised questions about Bittensor's decentralized claims and resulted in a loss of nearly $900 million in market capitalization, reflecting growing unease within the community.
The situation escalated when Sam Dare, founder of Covenant AI, revealed his project's departure from Bittensor on X. In a detailed post, Dare accused Jacob Steeves, Bittensor's founder, of exercising too much control over what is advertised as a decentralized network. He claimed that Steeves had halted emissions to Covenant's subnets and stripped them of key functionalities, applying economic pressure through strategic token sales. "The entire premise of Bittensor… is that no single entity controls it," Dare stated, asserting that the network's foundational promise is misleading.
This clash has created ripples throughout the Bittensor ecosystem, resulting in a significant downturn, with subnets collectively dropping by 26%. The TAO token, which had been trading around $338, fell to a low of about $253 before stabilizing near $270. The selling pressure triggered nearly $10 million in liquidations of long positions, exacerbating the losses for investors.
Community Divided
https://x.com/covenant_ai/status/2042380152831951300
The fallout goes beyond price declines; the Bittensor community is sharply divided over these events. While Dare's accusations have attracted attention, some community members question his motives. Notably, @DreadBong0, a key figure in the community, alleged that Dare had conducted a significant sell-off of 37,000 TAO worth of subnet alpha tokens as he exited, a move that reportedly harmed many investors who trusted Covenant AI. DreadBong0 described the situation as a potential "rug for max extraction," highlighting the increasing mistrust within the ecosystem.
In response, Steeves denied Dare's accusations, asserting that his sales were warranted as the subnets were non-operational and underperforming. He stressed that the visibility of token sales is unavoidable and that he did not have the unilateral ability to suspend emissions as claimed. This exchange has raised questions about governance within Bittensor and the future of its subnets, including SN3, SN81, and SN39, which were designed for specific AI tasks.
https://x.com/const_reborn/status/2042508660723581079
Market Implications
The fallout from this incident extends beyond the immediate price drop. Bittensor had been gaining momentum, especially after receiving endorsements from influential figures like NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang. The network's potential to attract institutional interest seemed promising, particularly with plans for the Grayscale TAO Trust possibly converting into a spot ETF. However, recent developments have cast doubt on the project's stability and governance—both critical factors for institutional investors.
As the Bittensor community navigates these challenges, the future of the TAO token and the entire subnet ecosystem remains in question. The departure of Covenant AI and the ensuing accusations may serve as a warning for decentralized projects, underscoring the need for governance and transparency to maintain community trust and market confidence.
https://x.com/DreadBong0/status/2042411101900394658
While some observers speculate on the long-term viability of the Bittensor network, the immediate focus will likely be on how the community addresses this crisis and works to restore confidence among its investors and partners. As the decentralized AI sector continues to develop, clarity in operations and governance will be essential to prevent similar disputes and uphold the integrity of its foundational principles.
The stories that move AI & crypto markets — before the market reacts.
Free. 7am ET. Five stories. 62,400 readers.
