The Bank Secrecy Act (BSA), enacted in 1970, is ill-equipped to handle the modern challenges posed by financial crimes driven by artificial intelligence and blockchain technology. During a House Financial Services Subcommittee hearing on May 21, Ari Redbord, Global Head of Policy at TRM Labs, made a strong case for regulatory reform, highlighting the shortcomings of current reporting frameworks in addressing the speed and complexity of today’s illicit financial activities.
Redbord cited alarming figures from TRM Labs’ 2026 Crypto Crime Report, which revealed that North Korean hackers stole over $2 billion in digital assets during 2025, with an additional $600 million already taken in early 2026. This trend is exacerbated by the rise of “pig butchering” scams, a form of long-con investment fraud that cost American victims more than $35 billion last year. The report also noted a staggering 500% increase in AI-enabled scams, emphasizing the urgent need for legislative action.
The existing framework, which relies heavily on banks to file Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs), is quickly becoming outdated. Redbord pointed out that while criminals can transfer stolen cryptocurrencies across multiple blockchains within a day or two, the current process for reporting suspicious activity can take over 30 days. This discrepancy creates a significant delay in regulatory responses, leaving a gap that cybercriminals are increasingly exploiting.
In response to these issues, Redbord urged Congress to equip agencies like the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) and the FBI with advanced “AI-native investigative tools.” These tools, including real-time blockchain analytics and machine learning systems, are crucial for keeping up with the rapidly evolving tactics of financial criminals.
The hearing garnered broad support from various stakeholders, including representatives from the Bank Policy Institute and the Atlantic Council, all agreeing on the need for a technology-driven overhaul of the BSA. Although no specific digital assets or protocols were mentioned, the emphasis remained on creating a regulatory framework that can adapt to the intersection of AI and digital assets in criminal activities.
Looking ahead, potential regulatory reforms could impose stricter compliance requirements on crypto exchanges and digital asset platforms. This might involve expedited reporting obligations and new standards for real-time monitoring and flagging of suspicious activities. The substantial financial losses from pig butchering schemes further heighten the demand for enhanced consumer protection measures, likely prompting the SEC, CFTC, and state regulators to engage more actively in enforcement discussions.
As financial crime continues to evolve, the push for a modernized regulatory approach could transform the governance of digital assets. Investors in the crypto space may soon find themselves navigating an environment characterized by increased oversight and stricter compliance mandates, fundamentally changing the operational dynamics of the sector.
The stories that move AI & crypto markets — before the market reacts.
Free. 7am ET. Five stories. 62,400 readers.
